| |
This is a posting
about a Russian analyst who believes the United States will not exist by
2010 and will be broken up into various parts owned by other countries.
Sure, it’s silly stuff. But let’s look at the underlying reasons for
such a prediction – while looking at ourselves. |
|
According
to Igor Panarin, in two years I'll be living here in Las Vegas under the
government of the Peoples Republic of China.
Panarin is a Russian academic
who has predicted that the United States would dissolve into four different
countries and be run by other countries.
For example, the Northeast
and parts of the Midwest would be part of the European Union. (Would that mean
easier access to Amsterdam?)
The northern plains would be
Canadian. (Think of how much better the NHL would be with fewer teams. And
Canada almost certainly wins the gold medal in the winter Olympics.)
The Republic of Texas would
be part of Mexico. (And this will bring one of the bloodiest civil wars of all
time. Bush and Cheney would be the new el Presidentes, getting what they've
wanted all along: controlling all oil reserves and declaring war on a group of
people who are clearly evil - the drug traffickers.)
And folks like me in the Far
West would be under China. (I can see us Las Vegans thinking that the gaming
industry will prosper greatly. But I doubt our comrades in Idaho are going to be
passive when it comes to the Chinese.)
And, here's the best: Russia
would get Alaska back. (Wouldn't that be justice for Sarah Palin? If she's still
governor, she would be taking orders from Vlad Putin.)
Surely, this is silly stuff.
Panarin is trained by the Kremlin so there is plenty of Russian wishful
thinking. It makes me realize that Russian intelligence is as out of whack as
ours was before 9/11.
I emailed the article to my
friend, John Alexander, a PhD who consults for U.S. Special Forces. He wrote
back: "While we have some significant problems, I suspect he (Panarin) is pretty
far off base."
Panarin really doesn't appear
(notice I said "doesn't appear") to "get" Americans. And I'd bet he never saw
Casablanca. Remember the Nazi, Major Strasser. He asks Rick about German forces
marching into New York City. Rick replies, "Well there are certain sections of
New York, Major, that I wouldn't advise you to try to invade." The same holds
true today whether it's Baltimore, Miami, LA, or Boise.
Apparently Panarin thinks
Americans and Russians are alike. A Washington Post article offers some good
counter-balance to Panarin. The article quotes Thomas Baerwald, an investigator
in a project called "Beyond Borders" and past president of the Association of
American Geographers. He compares Americans to the citizens who were living
under the former Soviet Union.
| |
“We constantly were
corrected when we tried to use the term ‘Soviets’ as a catch-all phrase
for residents of the U.S.S.R.,” Baerwald says. “People firmly told us
that they were Russians or Lithuanians or Estonians or Ukrainians or
other terms that identified a region or subregion that described their
own geographical identity. In contrast, if you ask U.S. residents what
term describes who they are, an enormous majority will reply ‘I am an
American.’ Even in those places where regional loyalties are especially
strong, such as Texas, loyalties to the U.S. are far greater than they
are to states or regions. |
|
Still, Panarin's predictions
resonate. He hits home in a slightly unsettling way. No one in America would
have heard of Panarin if the Wall Street Journal didn't publish a front-page
story on his findings and the Russian media frenzy following him. Ironically, it
is still the most read article on the Wall Street Journal online. Don't negate
this.
So, someone is obviously
giving Panarin an ounce of "what if?"

And
it's for good reason, too. We are in a financial mess that most of us can't
figure out. We see our leaders - namely the supposedly smarts ones like Paulson
and Bernanke - scratching their heads. President Obama has to put together a
team that is non-partisan; in other words, they really have to work since going
to Washington isn't a perk anymore but a responsibility as a citizen of this
country. He's really serious and that scares us.
I've written about a possible
Armageddon here. I still say you need to keep cash on reserve for 2009 and be
prepared to protect yourself and your loved ones. Too often, I hear from friends
- wealthy friends - who don't sleep at night wondering if their fortunes are
going to be wiped out.
We also hear from pundits,
sure they seem extreme, who say we're printing so much money that we will have
devalued the dollar to nothing, leading us to a regional currency called the
Amero that will include Mexico and Canada. Others say our debt is owned by
China, Saudi Arabia, and Dubai: if we default, then they own us. Hey we trashed
the analysts a few years ago who said we are headed for a housing collapse. Who
wouldn't at least listen to these new theories?
However, before you run for
the hills with shot-guns and survivalist supplies or you start trying to speak a
foreign language to get acquainted with your new oppressors or lawmakers, let me
assure you I'm only making a point here. We're not going to disintegrate.
However, Panarin's theory is
partially right. And this is the lesson we need to take from the theories of
this Russian.
We have disintegrated as a
country. We have strayed from our ideals. Am I condemning America? No, we
suffered through 9/11 and its effects are far deeper than we imagined. As a
result, we have, at times, stopped being the America we once were.
When President Bush and VP
Cheney point to their enduring achievement, it's that we were not attacked again
on American soil after 9/11. They're right. But they're wrong, too. As a result
of that goal, which we all clung to, we became a different country. We invaded
Iraq. We told the rest of the world, "You're either with us or against us." We
became a black and white country; we never saw the gray. Our leaders sounded
like Fascists. We acted like Fascists, torturing to allegedly stop torture.